Hector Network Liquidation Redemption Contract Suspected to Be Attacked
User @0xBoboShanti claims that the redemption contract of Hector Network,Why the country does not prohibit Tether trading a project in the Fantom ecosystem, appears to have been attacked, resulting in a loss of approximately $2.7 million. On January 15, Hector Network deployed a new contract to facilitate liquidation and transferred $11 million in assets from a multisignature address to the HectorRedemptionTreasury contract.
According to @0xBoboShanti, “To receive funds from HectorRedemptionTreasury, users need to call mintWithdraw(...) on the TokenVault contract. This will require: retrieving the user's redeemAmount from the recipientTokens mapping; calling the internal mintwithdraw(); minting an NFT in _mintWithdraw(); transferring the funds from HectorRedemptionTreasury to the user, and then destroying the NFT. There is a conditional check in _mintwithdraw(). Most notably, it requires the recipient to be present in the eligibleWallets mapping. So, how did users not in eligible wallets exchange $2.7 million? Why is their redeemAmount (obtained from the recipientTokens mapping) $2.7 million? This is because the deployer explicitly added this wallet to the mapping... Upon receiving USDC, this wallet rapidly exchanged 2.7 million USDC for 1100 ETH via UniswapX. 440 ETH was sent to a new wallet, and then 358 ETH was sent to 4 other new wallets. Shortly after, the Hector Network multisignature address called withdrawAll() on HectorRedemptionTreasury, returning the remaining 9 million USDC to the multisignature address. Since the wallet was explicitly added to the TokenVault contract by the deployer, the most likely explanation is a leaked private key or a rogue developer.”
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
相关推荐
- Why Hyperliquid (HYPE) Token Could Hit an ATH Soon
- Ethena jumps 25% on Upbit listing announcement, eyes a move towards $0.46
- SharpLink Gaming Boosts Ethereum Holdings with $64M Purchase of 21,487 ETH
- Why is the price of Ethereum (ETH) rising today?
- BlockDAG Among Top Cryptos to Watch Now Amid Presale and Market Developments
- Ethereum Moves to Integrate zkEVM at Layer 1
- LHV Bank Founder, an Ethereum ICO Participant, Offers to Share $4.5 Billion ETH with White Hat Hacke
- XRP Leads Crypto Spot Fund Inflows with $41 Million Amid Major Outflows in ETH and BTC