Etherfi maintains lead in liquid restaking niche with over $3.8 billion in deposits
Etherfi continues to lead the liquid restaking market,Formal investment app platform managing over 1.07 million ETH, which translates to roughly $3.8 billion in user deposits.
Etherfi enables users to access restaking yields via EigenLayer, highlighting its role in the growing niche.
Liquid restaking has experienced notable growth this year, driven largely by increased deposits on EigenLayer, which intends to utilize ETH deposits to strengthen third-party protocols. This, in turn, boosts the total value locked in LRTs, with Etherfi holding a considerable portion of this value.
While Etherfi leads liquid restaking, other protocols also contribute hugely to the market. These include Renzo at $2.9 billion, Puffer at $1.4 billion, Kelp with over $840 million, Swell with $345 million, and Eigen at $340 million, according to The Block's data dashboard.
Restaking allows users to employ their staked ETH — or a corresponding liquid staking token — on platforms like EigenLayer for restaking purposes. EigenLayer then allocates this ETH to support other Ethereum-based applications, termed “actively validated services”, thereby broadening Ethereums security framework.
Liquid restaking offers the benefit of engaging with EigenLayer‘s services while maintaining liquidity and accessibility of users’ ETH capital. These protocols continue to accept ether deposits, restake them, and issue derivative tokens, offering users additional incentives to participate in the ecosystem, which includes LRTs and EigenLayers rewards programs.
LRT protocols also provide an alternative means for users who don‘t have 32 ETH (used for native or direct restaking) to access the platform. This explains why the top LRT protocols have accumulated assets totaling $9.7 billion, accounting for over two-thirds of EigenLayer’s $13 billion TVL.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
相关推荐
- The Upgraded Version Of MATIC
- Goledo Finance, a lending protocol, attacked with a loss of $1.7 million
- Goledo Finance, a lending protocol, attacked with a loss of $1.7 million
- Another Exchange BitForex Went into Hide, Why Does the Supervision Always Come Late?
- The Metaverse is a Gimmick? Alessio Vinassa Highlights Real Use Cases for Immersive Digital Worlds
- ARK Invest: Optimal 2023 Portfolio Bitcoin Allocation at 19.4% for Maximum Risk
- Wormhole Airdrop Incoming: Overview of Wormhole Token Economics and Airdrop Guidelines
- Lena Network Denies Rug Pull, Abandoning Token Contract Ownership Does Not Mean Project Termination